India’s Ascendancy and the Multipolar Moment: Redefining Global Power in the Indo-Pacific and Beyond

5/12/20255 min read

India’s Ascendancy and the Multipolar Moment: Redefining Global Power in the Indo-Pacific and Beyond

In the swirling currents of 21st-century geopolitics, India is emerging as a pivotal force, reshaping the Indo-Pacific and the global order. As the world transitions from a unipolar past to a multipolar future, India’s strategic maneuvering—balancing regional blocs like BRICS and ASEAN while deepening ties with Western powers—signals a new era of influence. This blog post dives into India’s rising clout, the role of regional blocs in crafting a multipolar world, and the profound implications for international relations.

India’s Strategic Rise in the Indo-Pacific

India’s ascent is no accident. With the world’s fifth-largest economy (soon to be third), the second-largest military, and a burgeoning tech sector, India is leveraging its demographic and economic heft to assert influence. Its strategic location in the Indo-Pacific—a region encompassing the Indian and Pacific Oceans, home to critical trade routes and over two-thirds of the global population—positions India as a linchpin in global geopolitics. The Indo-Pacific is not just a geographic construct but a mental map of power, where India’s “Act East” policy and leadership in forums like the Quad (comprising India, the US, Japan, and Australia) underscore its ambition.

India’s foreign policy blends pragmatism with strategic autonomy, a legacy of its Non-Aligned Movement roots. Under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has deepened ties with ASEAN, hosting joint maritime exercises in the South China Sea in 2023 and strengthening bilateral defense partnerships with nations like Indonesia and the Philippines. These moves counter China’s assertiveness while fostering regional stability. Simultaneously, India’s role in the Quad promotes a “free and open Indo-Pacific,” aligning with Western interests without fully committing to any single bloc. This delicate balancing act—engaging with both the Global North and South—defines India’s unique geopolitical identity.

Yet, India’s rise is not without challenges. Its navy, critical for Indo-Pacific dominance, remains underfunded, and domestic issues like administrative inefficiencies and economic protectionism could hinder its global ambitions. Despite these hurdles, India’s ability to project soft power—through its diaspora, cultural heritage, and leadership in digital public infrastructure—amplifies its influence, particularly in the Global South.

Regional Blocs: Architects of a Multipolar World

Regional blocs like BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) and ASEAN are reshaping the global order by amplifying the voices of emerging powers. BRICS, with its recent expansion to include nations like Iran and the UAE, challenges Western-dominated institutions like the IMF and World Bank. For India, BRICS offers a platform to advocate for Global South interests, such as climate financing and equitable governance, while hedging against China’s dominance within the bloc. The 2024 BRICS summit in Russia, where India and China agreed to de-escalate border tensions, highlighted India’s ability to navigate complex rivalries while pursuing economic cooperation.

ASEAN, meanwhile, remains central to India’s Indo-Pacific strategy. As a cornerstone of the “Act East” policy, India engages ASEAN to foster economic connectivity and counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Initiatives like the ASEAN-India Maritime Exercise and defense deals with the Philippines signal India’s commitment to regional security. However, ASEAN’s internal divisions and reluctance to openly confront China pose challenges, pushing India to pursue bilateral ties with key members like Vietnam and Singapore.

These blocs are not just economic or security forums; they are crucibles for a multipolar world. BRICS promotes South-South cooperation, while ASEAN’s emphasis on consensus-driven diplomacy offers an alternative to great power hegemony. Together, they dilute the West’s historical dominance, creating space for middle powers like India to shape global norms.

The Multipolar Shift: Opportunities and Tensions

The shift to a multipolar world is both a promise and a peril. Unlike the Cold War’s bipolarity or the post-Cold War unipolar moment, multipolarity disperses power across multiple poles—China, India, the US, the EU, and others. This diffusion fosters inclusivity, allowing nations like India to advocate for reformed global governance, such as a permanent UN Security Council seat. India’s leadership in the Voice of the Global South Summits since 2023 exemplifies its role as a bridge between developed and developing worlds, addressing issues like food security and digital inclusion.

However, multipolarity also breeds complexity. The US-China rivalry, intensified in the Indo-Pacific, forces nations to navigate competing visions of order. India’s dual engagement with BRICS and the Quad illustrates this tightrope walk: aligning with the US to counter China while maintaining economic ties with Beijing (bilateral trade reached $113.8 billion in 2023). This hedging strategy risks alienating partners, as seen in Washington’s concerns over India’s rapprochement with China.

Moreover, multipolarity amplifies regional tensions. China’s assertiveness in the South China Sea and India’s border disputes with Beijing fuel mistrust, complicating Asia’s collective rise. The Indo-Pacific’s militarization, with alliances like AUKUS and trilateral pacts, underscores the fragility of regional stability. For India, the challenge is to foster a multipolar Asia that avoids zero-sum rivalries, as articulated by External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar: a world where power is dispersed, not concentrated.

Implications for International Relations

The multipolar shift redefines international relations in three key ways. First, it empowers middle powers. India, alongside nations like Indonesia and Brazil, can shape regional agendas without being subsumed by great power blocs. Second, it demands new forms of diplomacy. Minilateral forums like the Quad and I2U2 (India, Israel, UAE, US) offer flexible, issue-based cooperation, complementing traditional multilateralism. Finally, it challenges the West’s normative dominance. India’s push for a rules-based order rooted in sovereignty and inclusivity contrasts with China’s hierarchical vision, offering a third way in global governance.

For the US, India’s rise is both an opportunity and a puzzle. While India is integral to countering China, its strategic autonomy and BRICS engagement frustrate Washington’s desire for a clear ally. Europe, meanwhile, sees India as a partner in upholding a rules-based order, though divergences over Russia and democratic backsliding complicate ties. For the Global South, India’s leadership offers hope for a more equitable world, but its alignment with Western initiatives like the Quad raises questions about its non-aligned credentials.

The Road Ahead

India’s ascent in the Indo-Pacific and beyond heralds a multipolar world where power is shared, not monopolized. By leveraging regional blocs like BRICS and ASEAN, India is carving out a role as a global balancer, advocating for the Global South while engaging the West. Yet, the path is fraught with risks—rivalries with China, domestic constraints, and the complexities of multipolarity demand deft navigation.

As the global order evolves, India’s choices will shape not just the Indo-Pacific but the future of international relations. Can it maintain strategic autonomy in a polarized world? Will regional blocs like BRICS and ASEAN bridge divides or deepen them? And how will the world adapt to a multipolar reality where no single power reigns supreme? These questions linger, inviting us to ponder the contours of a new global era.

Word count: 1,050

Thought-Provoking Questions:

  1. Can India sustain its strategic autonomy while deepening ties with both the West and BRICS nations?

  2. How will the rivalry between India and China shape the Indo-Pacific’s security architecture?

  3. Are regional blocs like BRICS and ASEAN capable of fostering a truly multipolar world, or will they succumb to great power rivalries?